by: iCopywriter Senior Editor, Heather Price-Wright
Here’s a lesson from the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security: Watch what you tweet.
British 20-somethings Leigh Van Bryan and Emily Banting were
looking forward to their trip to Los Angeles. But when they arrived at Los
Angeles International Airport, they were greeted not by palm trees and movie
star sightings, but by Homeland Security officials, who detained the two in
separate holding cells for 12 hours, according to the Daily Mail. Van Bryan was apparently held with Mexican drug
dealers, and described the experiences as “really scary.”
Their offense? Two tweets.
Three weeks before the trip, Van Bryan tweeted “3 weeks
today, we’re totally in LA pissing people off on Hollywood Blvd and diggin’
Marilyn Monroe up!” Later, he tweeted, “free this week for a quick gossip/prep
before I go destroy America? x.”
Van Bryan claims the “diggin’ up Marilyn Monroe” phrase
comes from an episode of “Family Guy,” and that “destroy” is slang for partying
hard and getting drunk (a little like “wrecked” might be used on this side of
the pond).
Homeland Security didn’t seem to think those explanations
were adequate; they flagged the tweets and, after holding, questioning and
searching the two (they even looked for spades and shovels, ostensibly to be
used for disinterring Marilyn Monroe) put them back on a plane home. Van Bryan
says one agent told him, “You really f***ed up with that tweet, boy.”
The incident raised the hackles of privacy and free speech
advocates, who wondered whether Homeland Security should have the right to
undertake such extreme actions on the basis of nothing but statements made on
social media.
On the other hand, some claim that Twitter and similar sites
are public, and that people should understand that statements they make on such
sites might be subject to scrutiny, especially if they could be perceived as
threatening or violent.
It’s a tough debate, and one that is sure to rage on as
social media becomes a larger and larger part of public life.
What do you think? Does the government have the right to watch what we post and take action, or are tweets, status updates, check-ins and the like protected as free speech? Did Homeland Security overreact, or do its job to keep the country safe?
What do you think? Does the government have the right to watch what we post and take action, or are tweets, status updates, check-ins and the like protected as free speech? Did Homeland Security overreact, or do its job to keep the country safe?
Have you checked out iCopywriter.com lately?
No comments:
Post a Comment